this product is unavailable for purchase using a firm account, please log in with a personal account to make this purchase.

The LIV is currently closed to all visitors.

We are working remotely to deliver member services. For more information visit our 

COVID-19 Hub
Select from any of the filters or enter a search term

Anti-vilification laws should be strengthened

Anti-vilification laws should be strengthened

By LIV Media


Reforms recommended by Parliament’s Legal and Social Issues Committee to expand anti-vilification protections have been welcomed by the Law Institute of Victoria.

LIV President Tania Wolff said the reforms would strengthen Victoria’s human rights protections.

The report recommends the expansion of anti-vilification protections to cover attributes such as gender, disability, sexual orientation gender identity or expression, sex characteristics, HIVS/AIDS status and personal association in addition to race and religion.

“The report signals that there should be no tolerance in our community for taunts, slurs or aggression towards individuals with these attributes” Ms Wolff said.

“Broader laws will allow more people to call out hate speech.”

“We support new legislation to ensure that hate speech is categorically rejected as being contrary to our community values and support inclusion and a sense of belonging within our diverse communities,” Ms Wolff said.

She said that previous laws aimed against racial and religious vilification were underutilised.

The recommendations would lower the legal threshold to incitement-based vilification and introduces a harm-based provision which means that the focus will shift to the victim and the harms they experience as result of the vilifying conduct.

The LIV urges the government to adopt all of the Committee’s recommendations especially ensuring that education of these laws is targeted to communities who are affected by vilification.

By educating Victorians, our community will be more aware of their rights and it will also prevent this type of conduct occurring.

The LIV looks forward to continuing to work towards the implementation of the key recommendations and promoting a strong human rights culture in Victoria.

The LIV made two submissions to the inquiry and appeared at the public hearing:

LIV's first submission:

Second submission:

Public hearing transcript:

Views expressed on (Website) are not necessarily endorsed by the Law Institute of Victoria Ltd (LIV).

The information, including statements, opinions, documents and materials contained on the Website (Website Content) is for general information purposes only. The Website Content does not take into account your specific needs, objectives or circumstances, and it is not legal advice or services. Any reliance you place on the Website Content is at your own risk.

To the maximum extent permitted by law, the LIV excludes all liability for any loss or damage of any kind (including special, indirect or consequential loss and including loss of business profits) arising out of or in connection with the Website Content and the use or performance of the Website except to the extent that the loss or damage is directly caused by the LIV’s fraud or wilful misconduct.

Be the first to comment