this product is unavailable for purchase using a firm account, please log in with a personal account to make this purchase.

LIV President's Blog
February 10, 2011

Response to Alan Howe's column

This week I wrote a letter to the editor of the Herald Sun in response to Alan Howe's column published on Monday 7 February 2011. 

An edited version of the letter has been published today, Thursday 10 February 2011.

The Law Institute of Victoria is concerned by Alan Howe’s column on judicial sentencing.

Mr Howe would have us believe our worst criminals are literally getting away with murder. They are not.

Victorians are being well-served by the judiciary and the sentences handed down. Sentencing is not taken lightly by judges. It is a delicate balancing act which must take into account punishment, deterrence, rehabilitation, denunciation, protection of the community and an offenders’ circumstances. With so many variables to consider, it is crucial that judicial discretion be upheld and not erased by draconian legislation.

Because judges rarely impose sentences of life imprisonment does not mean there is a law and order crisis in Victoria. In rare instances where there is concern that a sentence is too lenient, there is an avenue to address those concerns. It is called the Court of Appeal.

Research by University of Melbourne academic Austen Lovegrove (pdf) shows that when the public knows all the circumstances of a case they mostly deliver the same or a more lenient sentence than the judge.

Respect for the courts and their officers is a cornerstone of democracy. To wage personal attacks on judges and second-guess their decisions is disrespectful. It encourages a disconnect between the public and the best people we have to do the job.

It also potentially puts society on a path to courtroom mayhem when the voice of reason on the bench might not be heard - literally.

View statement (pdf) from the Chief Judge of the County Court in response to an 'Opinion' piece by Alan Howe published in the Herald Sun on Monday 7th February, 2011.


Views expressed on (Website) are not necessarily endorsed by the Law Institute of Victoria Ltd (LIV).

The information, including statements, opinions, documents and materials contained on the Website (Website Content) is for general information purposes only. The Website Content does not take into account your specific needs, objectives or circumstances, and it is not legal advice or services. Any reliance you place on the Website Content is at your own risk.

To the maximum extent permitted by law, the LIV excludes all liability for any loss or damage of any kind (including special, indirect or consequential loss and including loss of business profits) arising out of or in connection with the Website Content and the use or performance of the Website except to the extent that the loss or damage is directly caused by the LIV’s fraud or wilful misconduct.

Steven Wharton
I strongly commend the Law Institute and our President for the eloquent defense of judicial discretion from the ill-informed, knee-jerk and vengeful ructions of the gutter press that is The Herald-Sun.
11/02/2011 1:27:14 PM

Anna Bolger
Please see response from the County Court of Victoria to article written by Alan Howe, published in the Herald Sun on Monday 7th February, 2011.
10/02/2011 5:27:10 PM

Leave comment

 Security code